A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among prospective neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their relatives property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly constructed, is in the right placement. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-higher drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location grew to become Probably the most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely observed that this sort of steps were cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being protected intimately through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became greatly searched phrases as viewers sought to grasp the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt construction pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second from the authorized timeline.
With the core with the dispute can be a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, continues to be called meticulous in his examination of scheduling documents, maps, and conditions connected to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal see, insisting instead that it's about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got explained their extensive-standing link to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair simply attempting to develop a loved ones René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site dwelling in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have been performed dependant on Experienced information and permitted options. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into The ocean for the duration of a storm, don't alter the underlying points.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how planning disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal internet site has become a shorthand description to get a situation that a lot of observers see as significantly frequent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation in between personal land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become extra contentious.
The Irish Situations post about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced previously been involved in area advocacy on scheduling and environmental challenges, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from extremely distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through midsection-higher water throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments and René Collier waded by means of waistline-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting each the Actual physical actuality from the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme method.
As being the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome stays unsure. The court have to identify whether or not the wall as developed complies with scheduling authorization and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Special Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and scheduling ailments. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside alongside one another prolonged after the lawful prices have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development operates at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary issues including environmental safety and residence rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a spot of organic splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal questions. Whether or not it's going to in the end be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as prepared will rely on the court’s findings. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to The most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.