A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental considerations, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their potential neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted less than scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their setting up authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their website, resulting in an encroachment on a Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions were cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a location impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a family residence in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that every one works are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea through a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any predicament a large number of observers see as ever more popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both the Actual physical reality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized fees are actually compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly René Collier to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.